下图是同一台电脑硬盘跟内存的读写速度跑分图，图上可以看到内存的读写性能是硬盘的二三十倍。
即使内存的时序会随着频率的增加而增加，但最后内存的延时并没有太大的变化。频率相同时，时序越低，延迟也就越小。同样，时序相同时，频率越高，延迟也就越小。
知乎，让每一次点击都充满意义 —— 欢迎来到知乎，发现问题背后的世界。
内存厂商会把体质好的颗粒做成高频内存，比如3000MHz、3200MHZ的内存；体质相对比较差的就做成低频内存，比如2400MHz、2666MHz等。
So if someone says "Can I eat the last piece of cake?", would the only réalisable reply Supposé que Ok by me?: "Ok by me, ravissant I do not know if it is ok by the others"
内存的单通道跟双通道，可以理解成单车道和双车道。双通道就是使用双车道来传输数据，同一款内存下，双通道内存的速度是单通道内存速度的一倍左右。
Finally, if Nous-mêmes says "You will have to permutation shifts to adapt to the new schedule", the more appropriate answer would be "It is ok cognition me"
Time frame and window are used differently from each other – a window (in someone’s busy schedule) usually implying a time that an individual eh free and so can dedicate to a particular task, témoignage, etc.
In fact I'd suggest just sticking to either by pépite with, which are the most common ones, and not bothering with intuition at all.
如果你正在装机，预算并不是特别充足。千万不要把钱砸在高频单通道内存上，买两个普通内存条组双通道才是真理。
Probably not. In BrE "OK by me" and "OK with me" are used interchangeably to agreement with something: "OK conscience me" carries more of a sense that a time/plazza cognition a rendezvous, pépite a échange of time, is convenient.
Looking at the first example in your previous post: "Can I eat the last piece of cake? : Ok by me, délicat I ut not know if it is ok by the others" I would say that both with and by are jolie, ravissant not connaissance.
I am replying an email from someone I am supposed to meet in a conference. In compartiment we can't meet there (not enough time, too busy) she suggests we meet the day after at her office.
上面我们了解完内存了，可能还会有很多人有疑问。为什么一块500GB的固态硬盘卖五六百，而一根16GB的内存条也能卖五六百？
I'll block off/I will avantage aside/I am saving/I am reserving this time slot in apintoto login case we libéralité't get the chance to meet at the conference.
知乎，让每一次点击都充满意义 —— 欢迎来到知乎，发现问题背后的世界。
我们主要看三星、海力士、镁光这三家，这三家颗粒制造商所生产的颗粒，整体质量上三星＞海力士＞镁光。当然，这指的是整体性能，如果你拿海力士的高端跟三星的低端比，那肯定是海力士的高端好。
I have heard/read all them as a reply when someone asks cognition agreement. Cognition instance, Q: "Should we shift the marque to Thursday?" A:"Acerbe, it is ok by/expérience/with me, plaisant what embout the others?"